I noticed `CODEOWNERS` documentation was missing, so I took a look at the source code and put something together.
Fixes#420
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1153
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Oto Šťáva <oto.stava@fghj.cz>
Co-committed-by: Oto Šťáva <oto.stava@fghj.cz>
@viceice has obligations on Wednesday which makes it more difficult for him to participate when the release is interrupted or delays for some reason.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1151
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Writing "lose" with two O's is a common mistake.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1146
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: Paul-Emmanuel Raoul <skyper@skyplabs.net>
Co-committed-by: Paul-Emmanuel Raoul <skyper@skyplabs.net>
I've fixed broken links, and where I was sure was appropriate, updated
the version in the link.
I did not change the version in the links in the `OCI image
installation` section, as I was unsure if I might actually break
something by changing the commands or the docker-compose.yaml. I haven't
had the opportunity to try and test that method out yet.
It seems like this is the option almost everyone setting email up for
their instance will want to enable, so it seemed worth mentioning in the
email setup guide.
- Ref: 4d8bc434a1
- Add a symbolic link for the current `release-schedule.json` to the
`forgejo-docs/next/release-schedule.json` location, so the forgejo
website knows which releases are stable, LTS and when they are EOL. This
is required to make the forgejo website run properly.
The shown command uses HEAD, so it will push the currently checked out
branch. Other non-HEAD examples will be shown further below.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1083
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <n0toose@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Rainer Müller <raimue@codingfarm.de>
Co-committed-by: Rainer Müller <raimue@codingfarm.de>
* better to not wait before swaggerfile on v9 becomes outdated
* unclosed bracket
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1074
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
